Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-07-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is much better than Google Pixel 6a, with a overall score of 88.3 against 76.4. Galaxy S10 is an much older phone than Google Pixel 6a, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S10 counts with a better looking screen than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features an extremely better processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 6a has improved battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.