Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the Google Pixel 6a, with a score of 86.3 against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy S10e is an a lot older cellphone than Google Pixel 6a, but Samsung was able to make it thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much better processing power than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video.
The Galaxy S10e has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 6a features a much better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10e is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.