Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is older and a little heavier than the Google Pixel 6a, it's construction is still a little thinner. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S20 FE has a really superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher number of cores (and faster). The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 6a and the Galaxy S20 FE count with incredibly similar battery durations, although the Galaxy S20 FE also has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4410mAh.
Galaxy S20 FE captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, a worse video definition and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video.
Galaxy S20 FE is a little more expensive than the Google Pixel 6a, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.