Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the Google Pixel 6a's overall score of 76.4. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 6a, but it is somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior CPU than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a higher number of cores and 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better screen than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a just a bit higher screen density, a bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 6a, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.