Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body has the same thickness than Google Pixel 6a, but it's noticeably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better processing power than Google Pixel 6a, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit better count of pixels per screen inch and a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Google Pixel 6a one, both have equal internal storage. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way better 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a much better video definition.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 6a, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.