Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-21 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a, getting a global score of 79.5 against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is an incredibly older phone than the Google Pixel 6a, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy S7 counts with an incredibly better display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy S7 counts with an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 6a, although it has less processing cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory. The Galaxy S7's camera is just as good as Google Pixel 6a's camera, and although the Galaxy S7 has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a worse resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Google Pixel 6a has more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The Google Pixel 6a counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 47% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S7 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.