Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 431 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 6a's overall score of 76.4. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version, providing some extra features and performance tweaks. Even being the best phone in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also much older, much thicker and notably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel amount per screen inch. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior processing power than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 2 more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Google Pixel 6a have similar battery durations, although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 6a takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a better resolution back camera and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 6a. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 6a, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.