Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a's score of 76.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a heavier device than Google Pixel 6a, but both are equally thin. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher number of faster cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel amount per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a quite larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 6a, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.