Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2019-09-20 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting an 83.3 score against 82.2. The Apple iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with Android 14 OS. IPhone 11 counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 828 x 1792px and a bit greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
The iPhone 11 features a much more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and 12 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much greater storage for applications and games than iPhone 11, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 11 has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a back camera with much less megapixels and a lower (4K) video definition. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3110mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.