Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 14 | iOS 9.x |
| -- | 2015-09-09 |
| -- | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s is slightly better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), with an 83 score against 82.2. The iPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x operating system, while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) works with Android 14 operating system. IPhone 6s counts with a way better performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 6 less processing cores (although they are faster) and 14 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 6s counts with a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a higher 1334 x 750 resolution. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 6s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1715mAh. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a bit better camera than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.