Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting an 88.1 score against 82.2. The iPhone X has a lot better hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lower number of cores and 13 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X features an incredibly better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a way better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. IPhone X's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) one, both have the same internal storage.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone X and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) have extremely similar cameras, although the Apple iPhone X has a worse video quality and a camera in the back with way less megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.