Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-01 |
| -- | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ, having an 82.2 score against 81. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s design is a lot lighter and a lot thinner than LG G7 ThinQ. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has 14 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a lot greater display density. LG G7 ThinQ has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much faster processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a very superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.