Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a score of 82.2 against 81.3. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s body is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way higher screen pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.