Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 82.2 score against 81.2. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has newer 14 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s design is extremely thinner and much lighter than the LG V40 ThinQ.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a really longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.