Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s score of 82.2. The LG Velvet counts with a much better performing processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
LG Velvet has a better screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch. LG Velvet has a much better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, they both have a 48 mega pixels camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features improved battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.