Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s score of 82.2. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a really superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better looking display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a greater pixels quantity in each display inch. Galaxy A52 shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.