Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s overall score of 82.2. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way better processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.