Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting an 87.5 score against 82.2. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a much better looking display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A71 counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 has a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A71, because it has an 11 percent more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A71 captures way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.