Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-02-22 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting an 88.1 score against 82.2. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Galaxy F62 features a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy F62 counts with more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a much greater performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.