Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), with a 90.8 score against 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features an extremely better CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a sharper display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.