Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), with a 98.9 score against 82.2. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a much greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way better 108 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.