Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, with a general score of 82.2 against 81.2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a lighter and notably thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much sharper display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a just a bit higher display density. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a back camera with way more mega pixels and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.