Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, with a overall score of 82.2 against 79.3. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a noticeably lighter and notably thinner device than Galaxy Note 5. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has the newer 14 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering some additional features.
Galaxy Note 5 has a lot better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixels density and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.