Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-07-07 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a global score of 82.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s construction is much thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a way better screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixel amount per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and higher video frame rate. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.