Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2017-09-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.88 ounces |
| -- | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has a global score of 83, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 82.2 general score. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note8 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a much higher display pixels density. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note8 features a much more powerful processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has higher video frame rate and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.