Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s general score of 82.2. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14 version. Galaxy S10 features a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a much better pixel number per inch of screen.
Galaxy S10 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 captures a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot less MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.