Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), with a overall score of 86.3 against 82.2. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much sharper display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a greater pixels count per display inch.
Galaxy S10e has a way better processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S10e has a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.