Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s overall score of 82.2. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S20 features an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Galaxy S20 has a way better processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S20 counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a way better video resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.