Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a score of 90.8 against 82.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE has a much faster processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a back camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.