Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a 98 score against 82.2. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much faster CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better screen density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much better resolution camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a battery lifetime that is just as good as Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.