Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a 95.4 score against 82.2. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a much better screen pixel density. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a way better video quality and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.