Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has an overall score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a much lighter and much thinner cellphone than Galaxy S7. Galaxy S7 features a very superior performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 12 GB lesser RAM.
Galaxy S7 features a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way better pixels count per inch of screen. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a way better resolution camera and better video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.