Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, with an 82.2 score against 78.1. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s design is way lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge. These phones work with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has an older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a lot better hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S7 edge counts with an incredibly better screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and much more pixels per display inch.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.