Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has an overall score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S8's general score of 81.7. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s construction is a lot lighter and notably thinner than the Galaxy S8. Galaxy S8 features a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixels amount per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy S8 counts with a much faster processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a camera with lot more MP and better video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.