Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a overall score of 83.3 against 82.2. Galaxy S9 has a much sharper display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a lot better number of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S9 counts with a much powerful CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S9 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower video definition and a camera with much less mega pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.