Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 311 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 82.2 score against 80.1. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a much thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has the previous 14 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot higher pixel count per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really superior performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a much higher video resolution. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.