Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s construction is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a very superior performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way higher (4K) video resolution. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.