Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-09 |
| -- | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.20 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, with an 82.2 score against 80.6. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a much lighter and way thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an incredibly better screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a very superior processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.