Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s general score of 75.7. The Apple iPhone X features a much better performing processor than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 5 more processing cores and a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X has a better display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. Apple iPhone X has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal memory.
IPhone X counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored). The Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) shoots slightly better photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.