Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), having a overall score of 87.1 against 75.7. The LG Velvet has a much more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster). The LG Velvet features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
LG Velvet has a superior camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, they both have a 48 mega-pixels back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.