Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), getting an 83.8 score against 75.7. Galaxy A50 has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy A50 features an extremely better processing unit than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster). Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A50 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.