Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s 75.7 score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy A51 has a bit better screen than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A51 has a way better hardware performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Galaxy A51 shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 48 MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy A51 has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.