Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), getting a global score of 91.3 against 75.7. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version while Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a really superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a little worse pixel count per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.