Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), with a score of 87.5 against 75.7. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version while Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy A71 features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a bit lower pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a little bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a way better processing power than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster). Samsung Galaxy A71 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.