Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s 75.7 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a brighter display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bit better display density and a bit larger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a really superior performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.