Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s general score of 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S10 counts with a much greater processing power than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have 8 GB of RAM, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S10 has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy S10 also has a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored). Galaxy S10 and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) count with extremely similar cameras, although the Galaxy S10 has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.