Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), getting a 94.8 score against 75.7. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has older 13 version and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15. Galaxy S20 features a much better performing processor than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Galaxy S20 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little bigger screen and a greater screen pixels density. The Galaxy S20 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a much less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better video quality.
Galaxy S20 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.