Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), getting a score of 90.8 against 75.7. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S20 FE features a much powerful CPU than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a quite worse pixels amount per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy S20 FE features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.