Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s score of 75.7. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), but it is incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior processing power than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.