Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), having a 77.8 score against 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15 version, so it provides the user some additional features and optimized performance. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), but it's noticeably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a better display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count in each inch in the display. Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Galaxy S5 Sport has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored). The Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) also has faster video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.